The Consulting Firm for Student Athletes and their Families

You are here:

Actions speak louder than words during recruiting process

What's the only thing in football that's worth less than a big favorite in a big game in University of Phoenix Stadium?

A verbal commitment from a college recruit.

Dan Hawkins
Dan Hawkins understands the pressures of recruiting both as a coach and as the father of a player.

Wednesday marks a national holiday for college football recruitniks, when players sign letters of intent. For fans who have obsessed over the whims of teenagers for months, it should be a day of immense relief.

Those signed letters are binding. Young men who have changed their mind more often than Hamlet finally have to put it in writing. That will be a welcome change after player de-commitments have reached epidemic proportions.

According to Scouts Inc., ESPN.com's recruiting bureau, 156 players have de-committed from one school in favor of another this recruiting season. Fourteen of those players de-committed more than once. Eleven of the de-commits rank among the ESPN 150.

And those are just the ones we know of. Surely there were many more that never were publicized.

About one-third of those 156 de-commitments can be attributed to coaching changes. The other two-thirds can be attributed to the raging insincerity that now flows both ways in football recruiting.

Put it this way: The term "soft verbal" is now part of the recruiting nomenclature. (It means: "I'm kinda committed. Meanwhile, I'll be visiting another school next Saturday.")

School-player recruiting relationships are lasting as long as junior-high romances. Players aren't committing to programs so much as going steady with them for a few weeks, then moving on to the next pretty face. That's why rival recruiters completely disregard commitments and keep on calling and writing.

How bad is it right now? So bad that college basketball recruiting -- a mud fight in the best of times -- looks honorable in comparison. North Carolina basketball coach Roy Williams recently said he hopes his sport never becomes as anarchic as football.

"You're not making a commitment," Williams said. "You're making a reservation."

And as every restaurant will tell you, reservations are made to be broken.

Part of the problem is that the recruiting cycle starts earlier now than ever. Players are making more unofficial campus visits in the spring, when they often encounter the hard sell.

Coaches can pressure recruits like car salesmen who get customers onto their lot. The goal is to close the deal before they leave. An impulse buy is the purchaser's problem, not the seller's.

That's why media following recruiting make their phone calls on Sunday nights, to see who committed on the spot. But not all teenagers coming off a whirlwind weekend make a commitment they'll keep.

"Sometimes we bring them in on a trip and they get excited and want to commit," Colorado coach Dan Hawkins said. "I tell them to go back home, get rid of the buyer's high and think about it. I want to shake hands, look them in the eye and feel good about the deal.

"I don't have a halo flying over my head. But I just totally believe the kid's got to do what's best for himself."

The earlier a player commits, the longer he has to wait until he can sign a letter. Which has some coaches pushing for an early signing period.

Basketball instituted a November signing period quite a while ago, and it's been popular. Players have been happy to get a college decision out of the way before their senior seasons begin.

There have been proposals from football coaches for a signing period during the late spring of a player's junior year, and for a December period as well. Junior-college players already can sign in December; coaches want to know why players who have made a decision cannot do the same at that time.

The problem with an early signing period is the ensuing chaos when a coach is fired. Recruits who lock themselves in early, without knowing with certainty who their coach will be, are asking for trouble.

For now, players who commit early and then must wait for months to sign are still considered in play. Whereas most basketball coaches back off committed prospects, football coaches don't always extend their rivals the same professional courtesy.

In fact, the saying is that a player's verbal commitment just shows other coaches where to focus their work. And although that saying has its roots in the Southeastern Conference, it's hardly just an SEC thing now.

At least 11 Big 12 schools have picked up a commitment from a current high school senior who originally pledged to another school. More than half the Pac-10 and Big Ten have done the same. Half the ACC, as well.

The flip side of the pressure sell is the prospect who struggles to say no. Nobody likes to deliver bad news, and that task can be especially difficult for kids. Hawkins saw it firsthand with his son, Cody, a quarterback who turned down overtures from plenty of schools to play for the Buffaloes with his dad.

"He had such a difficult time," Dan Hawkins said. "I'd say, 'You need to call so-and-so and tell them [no].' He had a hard time with that."

It's always easier to say yes than no. But college football players need to reacquaint themselves with the meaning of the word commitment. It doesn't mean you're going steady until something hotter comes along.

19 comments (Add your own)

1. mike wrote:
that sucks for coaches who think they have players and then they back out

February 4, 2008 @ 4:20 PM

2. lindsay223 wrote:
but what about the players who think they are committed but the coach suddenly gets someone else...then they are scrambling to find another school

February 4, 2008 @ 4:22 PM

3. loren25 wrote:
no one can be trusted unless it's in writing...that's what this is proving...people are sneaky.

February 4, 2008 @ 4:23 PM

4. lisa wrote:
I bet this will happen with basketball too and other sports. Football is just the beginning...

February 4, 2008 @ 4:24 PM

5. Mark wrote:
In response to Lindsay.. That rarely happens where a coach goes back on his word in the recruiting process among athletes. They usually will not offer a scholarship until they have seen all of their options; the athletes need to do the same when accepting these offers.

February 4, 2008 @ 4:25 PM

6. Doug wrote:
These kids are young. An 18 year old can't decide what he wants for dinner let alone where he wants to spend the next four years of his life. For this reason the parents need to be involved in the decision, and the athlete needs to take this decision very seriously.

February 4, 2008 @ 4:27 PM

7. Kelly wrote:
The coaches should relax more and be completely honest with the athletes. All of the bribing in the recruiting process should be kept to a minimum; the flashy cars and new apartments that are a part of the "offer" are what cause the kids are all too often basing their decisions on.

February 4, 2008 @ 4:30 PM

8. Billy wrote:
I think that the signing day should be moved up. It would take a lot of the politics out of the whole signing ordeal.

February 6, 2008 @ 12:32 PM

9. Jimmy j wrote:
Why don't we not have verbal commitments and then when signing day comes you sign with the school you are going to go to. If a verbal means nothing then why have them. The kids can change their mind and the coaches don't stop recruiting the kids once they have a made a verbal to another school.

February 13, 2008 @ 4:57 PM

10. Brendon wrote:
In response to Jimmy's idea not to have verbal commitments at all; not everyone breaks that law, so to rid the recruiting process of verbal commitments all together would be unfair to those athletes that abide by the rules. There are plenty of athletes who don't break their verbal commitments.

February 18, 2008 @ 4:36 PM

11. Reyna wrote:
This stuff happens all the time. Verbal commitments really mean nothing. Unfortunate but true.

March 3, 2008 @ 5:19 PM

12. A.D. wrote:
Well Mark, I have seen more coaches back out of commitments than I have athletes. The coaches are there to tell the player what they want to here, and when the next best thing comes, the scholarship goes with it.

March 4, 2008 @ 5:55 PM

13. Don wrote:
Well Kelly it is not that easy for these coaches to relax, I mean there is a lot od pressure on them to be the best. Coaches get fired all the time for having just one down year. Its a rough gig and no one's job is safe

April 4, 2008 @ 12:46 PM

14. Adina wrote:
I guess you always need a plan B. There really isn't a guarantee unless it's in writing.

April 7, 2008 @ 12:57 PM

15. Q wrote:
i dont feel bad for the coaches at all, a lot of them will promise anything to get you to sign or to at least take you away from a rival

April 15, 2008 @ 3:44 PM

16. Justin wrote:
I dunno about you guys but I am still siked over the draft, anyways Q is rt

April 29, 2008 @ 5:34 PM

17. Rog wrote:
People are bad, to have the gual to try and pull a fast one on a trusting kid and his family is ridiculous

April 29, 2008 @ 5:38 PM

18. David wrote:
High school athletes should go to the school that suits them best instead of choosing the most promising athletic program. This may be hard but too many times kids transfer because of playing time, don't fit the program, or don't like the area.

May 29, 2008 @ 5:27 PM

19. David wrote:
I also hear too many families rely on their kids athletic ability. This carries over to their son or daughter who think that school is on the bottom of the lists compared to their desired sport. There are success stories of athletes who carried their ability through college and into the pros...but most of the time injuries, overall ability, and lack of determination or work ethic hinder their dream of reaching "the show" or getting the "big bucks." Properly choosing the right school should include everything, but the family needs to keep in mind that an education is more valuable than a scholarship. Because in the end you can always fall back on your degree and not on a surgically repaired ACL or a pretty jump shot.

May 29, 2008 @ 5:31 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.