The Consulting Firm for Student Athletes and their Families

You are here:

Football Blog

  • Oregon pulls written offer, an unsavory move that's common

    After the tears of joy dried, Todd Therrien advised Xavier Ramos to take care of some serious business. Therrien, the coach at St. Bonaventure (Ventura, Calif.), told Ramos, a rising senior linebacker, to do the classy thing. He told Ramos, who had just happily accepted a written scholarship offer from Oregon, to call his other suitors -- Arizona, Army, Wyoming and others -- to tell them that he was off the market.

    Two weeks later, Therrien is still waiting for Oregon coaches to call Ramos and tell him why he's back on the market. Meanwhile, Therrien has said Oregon coaches aren't welcome around his program, and Ducks head coach Mike Bellotti is getting creamed by a tidal wave of bad PR. So what happened? Oregon coaches did exactly what their colleagues at every other Football Bowl Subdivision school in the country do every year. They offered more scholarships than they had to give. And, as is often the case, a recruit got screwed.

    Oregon coaches eagerly accepted the commitment from Ramos, a 6-foot, 187-pounder who changed the course of last season's California Division III state title game with a series of hits from the free safety position. With a 3.5 grade point average and a 1,550 (out of 2,400) on the SAT, Ramos is a lock to qualify academically. Not long after Ramos committed, though, Therrien got a call from Eugene. A mistake had been made, Therrien was told. Unbeknownst to the assistant who accepted the commitment from Ramos, another linebacker had committed a day earlier. The Ducks could take only one of the players, and Ramos was out. Ramos was crushed. Therrien, whose program produces several top prospects every year, was furious.

    "We're finding out written offers don't mean anything," said Therrien, who also coached Darrell Scott, the class of 2008's top running back. "That's just crazy."

    Unfortunately, it's business as usual. The NCAA allows schools to bring in 25 new scholarship football players a year, but some coaches hand out between 200 and 300 written offers a year. In other words, a written scholarship offer is about as valuable as a buy-one-get-one-free coupon from Wendy's. Check that. With the coupon, at least you know you're getting a burger.

    Though Bellotti and his staff may seem heartless, they actually handled the Ramos situation in the second-classiest way the dysfunctional existing system allows. (The classiest would have been to honor the scholarship they offered.) Plenty of coaches would have said nothing. They would have waited until days before Signing Day, kept Ramos in their pocket as a fallback and then cut him loose when they realized they would sign their top targets.

    NCAA rules forbid Bellotti and his staff from speaking about specific recruits. Oregon asked for and received a one-time exception to the rule this week to allow Bellotti to release a statement about the situation. "Another young man committed to us earlier at the same position and we didn't feel we could accept both of them," Bellotti said in the statement. "There were breakdowns in communication resulting in the situation not being handled as we would have preferred.

    "We always feel it is best to notify all parties involved of our intentions early, while they still have options to pursue other opportunities, rather than wait until February when their options are limited."

    In an interview with SI.com last Thursday, Bellotti explained how Oregon coaches determine the number of scholarships they offer. "If we have a spot for an athlete at one position and we have two scholarships, we might offer five to 10 people at that position for those two spots to try to get them to come to campus, to try to get them to visit officially," Bellotti said.

    Bellotti said most top-tier recruits will not take an official visit without an offer. He also said his staff offers between 75 and 115 players in a given year. According to Rivals.com, 70 class of 2009 players have said they received offers from Oregon. That's good for third in the Pac-10, ahead of USC (54) and UCLA (41), but behind Arizona (136) and Stanford (98).

  • Case Exposes Flaws in Community College Pipeline for Athletes

    The flow of athletes from community colleges to four-year institutions is one of the hazier aspects of intercollegiate athletics. As the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s academic eligibility rules for freshmen have ebbed and flowed over the years, two-year colleges have often been a refuge for players who could not qualify for NCAA competition out of high school — and some four-year colleges have developed pipelines, sometimes aboveboard and sometimes quietly, for athletes from two-year institutions to their own. 

    One particular relationship drew the attention and concern of the NCAA’s Division II Committee on Infractions Wednesday. The panel placed the University of Central Oklahoma on three years’ probation and barred its football team from appearing on television (or virtually any form of video transmission, a sign that the NCAA is moving into the digital age) for the next two seasons, citing a series of rules broken by its former football coach in recruiting players from the two-year college where he formerly worked. 

    The problem wasn’t that the former coach, Chuck Langston, recruited community college players from Texas’ Trinity Valley Community College; NCAA colleges are allowed to recruit two-year college players. The problem was that Langston, who recruited 40-odd community college players during his five years at Central Oklahoma, brought at least a half dozen of them to the area around the campus “without visible means of support and before they were qualified for admission and athletics competition or aid,” the Division II Committee on Infractions said in its news release about the case. Many of the athletes, the NCAA panel noted in its full report on the case, “had academic deficiencies that had to be cured before they could be admitted into the institution and be eligible for athletics participation.” 

    “Once they were in the vicinity of the campus, but before they were enrolled full-time at the university, the young men were provided impermissible benefits including medical treatments, the use of institutional facilities, as well as free housing, meals and transportation. The benefits were provided by members of the athletics staff, including coaches and enrolled student-athletes. The university paid the costs of surgery for one prospective student-athlete prior to his enrollment in the total amount of $4,772, and on one occasion an assistant coach supplied one of the young men with a $200 cash payment.” 

    Those breaches were just the start of it. Langston, whom Central Oklahoma let go after the 2007 season after the university acknowledged the truth behind some of the allegations against him, encouraged players to mislead investigators about some of the benefits they received, the NCAA panel said. The athletics director failed to aggressively investigate charges against the coach with which he was confronted, one of several failures that led the NCAA to find that the university lacked “institutional control” over the sports program. 

    The penalties, some of which the university imposed on itself, were unusually severe. Cited for unethical conduct, Langston and any institution that seeks to hire him within the next two years will be required to appear before the Division II infractions panel and explain why it should not face penalties for doing so. Central Oklahoma will lose two scholarships this year and four each in each of the next two years. 

    And the NCAA panel also barred the football team from appearing in “any telecast” during the next two seasons. “This ineligibility to appear on television shall include live broadcasts, delayed broadcasts, cable, Web and broadband broadcasts and game footage that exceeds a total of five minutes on coaches’ shows at the institution,” the NCAA said in its report. 

    The NCAA’s Division I infractions committee used to bar teams that committed serious violations from television all the time, but that practice has fallen out of vogue (perhaps because the financial impact of such decisions have grown). Bruce Kirsch, chairman of the Division II panel and a vice president at Franklin Pierce University, was asked why the committee had opted to restrict Central Oklahoma’s appearances on television or the Internet rather than barring it from postseason competition, as is somewhat more common practice. He said the panel had concluded that there was a “greater possibility” that a ban on public appearances would have an impact on the program, and many colleges show off their teams than a ban on playoff participation, which “may not take effect” given the team’s likely performance. 

    Like an increasing number of institutions, Central Oklahoma broadcasts live video of its football games and other athletic events, and would be barred from doing so for football under the NCAA policy. 

    University officials could not be reached for comment on whether they planned to appeal the NCAA’s ruling. 

    — Doug Lederman
  • Going to court over commitment

    Recruit sues Hawaii over rescinded scholarship offer

    Daniel Smith took an unofficial visit to the University of Hawaii in April 2007, and is now suing the school and a former Hawaii assistant for pulling a scholarship offer.
    Daniel Smith took an unofficial visit to the University of Hawaii in April 2007, and is now suing the school and a former Hawaii assistant for pulling a scholarship offer.
    Courtesy of Smith family

    When the Smith family moved to Boise, from North Carolina last fall, Wanda Smith flew a University of Hawaii flag outside their new house. That caused quite a stir among the Boise State fans living nearby -- the Warriors and Broncos are conference rivals -- but Smith didn't care; her son Daniel had orally committed in April to play for the Warriors.

    Before he made the commitment, Daniel Smith claims he had to promise he wouldn't entertain offers from other schools. So when Wanda Smith received a phone call in January -- following coach June Jones' departure to Southern Methodist -- from a Hawaii assistant claiming her son hadn't received an official offer, Daniel had no other scholarship options.

    So now, Daniel Smith is taking the NCAA's system of verbal commitments to court by suing Hawaii and former Warriors defensive line coach Jeff Reinebold, who is now the receivers coach at SMU.

    "I'm not trying to get any money. I'm just trying to get my scholarship that I was promised 10 months ago," Smith said. "They told me to not talk to any other school, to tell everyone I was committed to Hawaii. I did, for 10 months. And one day my scholarship is gone."

    Smith's situation isn't unique. Every year, thousands of athletes find themselves scrambling for scholarships after coaching changes or after coaches simply rescind non-binding scholarship offers because they found more talented players. What is unique is that Smith has decided to take his case to court.

    "This is the first one that I'm aware of of this type where an athlete has actually proceeded to file a lawsuit," said Wake Forest law professor Timothy Davis, an expert in contract and sports law. "I've heard of similar cases where there were some rumblings made and some complaints, but they were resolved amicably by the athlete and the institution."

    Sports law scholars will watch this case closely, because it could set a legal precedent. If a school must pay after revoking a scholarship offer it may force schools to fundamentally chance the process by which they offer scholarships.

    "What's interesting about it is that it's a practice that happens more frequently than universities would like to admit," Davis said. "That's why I think it would be an important case and would establish an important precedent."

    Smith, who played his junior season at Providence High in Charlotte, N.C., became intrigued by Hawaii while watching the Warriors' 41-24 win over Arizona State in the 2006 Hawaii Bowl. The following March, Wanda Smith sent a highlight tape of her son for Reinebold to evaluate. Wanda Smith said she received an e-mail on March 15, 2007 from Reinebold inviting Smith to come to the campus on an unofficial visit. The text of the e-mail is included in Smith's complaint:

    "ALOHA WANDA,

    "YES I DID RECEIVE THE VIDEO AND I DO THINK THAT DANIEL IS A DIVISION 1 PROSPECT AS A DEFENSIVE BACK....WE WOULD LOVE TO WELCOME HIM ON AN UNOFFICIAL VISIT THIS SPRING AND IF YOU WOULD GET BACK TO ME WITH DATES THAT YOU WILL BE HERE I CAN MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR HIM TO MEET WITH ACADEMIC PEOPLE HERE AT HAWAII.....

    "HAVE A GREAT WEEKEND AND THANKS FOR SENDING THE VIDEO...

    "ALOHA

    "JEFF"

     
    When June Jones went from Hawaii to SMU in January, some recruits were left behind.
    When June Jones went from Hawaii to SMU in January, some recruits were left behind.
    AP

    Reached by SI.com via e-mail, Reinebold, a former Canadian Football League head coach, declined to comment on the case, citing pending litigation. John McNamara, Hawaii's associate athletic director for external affairs, said no one at the university would comment because of the pending litigation.

    After they received Reinebold e-mail inviting them to take an unofficial visit, the Smiths spent about $4,000, Wanda said, to go to Hawaii on April 1 and 2. While there, the Smiths said they met with Hawaii defensive backs coach Rich Miano and watched tape of Daniel in Miano's office. Daniel said that on April 26 -- his birthday -- he received a call from Reinebold, who offered a scholarship.

    "Right before he offered it," Daniel said. "He said 'If we offer you a scholarship, we want you to be 100 percent committed to us, and we'll be 100 percent committed to you.' ... I told him I was 100 percent committed, and I committed right there."

    At the time, Daniel said, he had a written scholarship offer from Division I-AA Portland State. The Smiths never received a written offer from Hawaii. Oral and written scholarship offers are considered non-binding until a prospect signs a National Letter of Intent, in which the school promises to provide a scholarship in return for the athlete enrolling for at least a year.

    Because the Smith's never insisted on a written scholarship offer, their case may hinge on that claim. The Smiths' attorney, Mark Valencia, said the legal basis of their complaint is the principle of promissory estoppel, which takes place when Party A relies on a promise from Party B to the detriment of Party A. A written agreement isn't always necessary to prove promissory estoppel.

    Matt Mitten, the director of the National Sports Law Institute at Marquette University's law school, said the promissory estoppel claim is the strongest in Smith's complaint, and he believes a judge would allow the case to proceed based on that claim. Still, the Smiths could face problems because they never obtained a written offer. "It's fairly difficult to prevail on an oral promise because of proof issues," Mitten said.

    The Smiths must prove Reinebold asked Daniel to refrain from dealing with other schools following his commitment. Terry Duffield, a former Hawaii graduate assistant who worked closely with Reinebold for much of 2007, said such a statement would be out of character for Reinebold.

    "After knowing Jeff like I do, there's no way in hell he made that statement," Duffield said. "Jeff Reinebold would encourage a kid to test the waters before he made a lifetime commitment. That's the kind of guy Jeff is."

    Shortly after Daniel committed, Rivals.com and the two daily newspapers in Honolulu carried stories trumpeting his commitment. Even after Daniel was cited for several alcohol violations in September stemming from a party he threw when his parents weren't home, he remained in contact with Reinebold. In monthly conversations, Daniel said, Reinebold assured him the scholarship was his.

    Daniel said he never spoke to Jones, Hawaii's head coach. And while most schools require the head coach to sign off on any scholarship offer, Hawaii's assistants under Jones sometimes did offer scholarships on their own. Greg Brown, a Las Vegas personal trainer, said Miano offered his son, Corbin, a scholarship last year. Corbin, a safety from Spring Valley High, called Miano in September to commit to Hawaii.

    Not long after, the Browns says Hawaii coaches stopped answering their calls and e-mails. In late October, Greg Brown received an e-mail from Miano saying Corbin should "keep his recruiting options open. "They never had the balls to call him" and say the scholarship offer had been rescinded, Greg said. Corbin eventually signed to play at Air Force.

    At the same time, Daniel Smith remained convinced he had a scholarship to Hawaii. He tried to set up an official visit -- in which the school pays the prospect's travel costs -- late in the season, but he said he was told Jones did not want distractions on the sideline. Smith said he began to worry when he read on a recruiting site that several players had committed on their official visits

    In college football recruiting, the most talented players have the most options. Jeannette (Pa.) quarterback Terrelle Pryor, ranked by some recruiting services as the nation's top prospect, still has not signed a Letter of Intent. But if Pryor asked, dozens of schools would immediately offer him a scholarship. That isn't the case for players such as Smith, whose talent places them on the border between the Division I-A and Division I-AA.

    On Jan. 11, the Smiths say that Reinebold called them to say that because of Jones' departure to SMU, all previous scholarship offers had been revoked. With less than a month until national Signing Day, Smith needed to find a new school. Wanda Smith said she contacted about 40 schools trying to find a place for her son, but no one had a scholarship available for him.

    According to the Smiths' complaint, Wanda Smith received a call from offensive coordinator Ron Lee "on or about Jan. 19" in which Lee told Wanda that Hawaii had never made a scholarship commitment to Daniel On Jan. 28, Wanda contacted Valenica, a Hawaii-based lawyer and Warriors season-ticket holder who promised he would make inquiries before filing suit. On Jan. 30, according to the complaint, Wanda received a second call from Lee, who told her the football program had no record of Daniel and that denied that Daniel had met with Miano on his unofficial visit. On the eve of national Signing Day, Valencia filed suit in Hawaii Circuit Court.

    Marquette's Mitten believes the damage to Hawaii's reputation may give the school incentive to settle (although in its response to the complaint, Hawaii has asked a judge to dismiss the suit and for the Smiths to pay for the school's legal fees). Mitten doubts any judge would order the school to put Smith on a football scholarship, though. He believes Smith would more likely receive the cost of one year at Hawaii, which is all Smith would have been guaranteed had he signed a Letter of Intent. "Hawaii's got to look at this," Mitten said, "and say, 'What is the negative PR value of this?'"

    Wake Forest's Davis said the case will boil down to which side is telling the truth. But it could have farther reaching effects. For years, pre-signing day system of verbal commitments between players and schools has allowed each to exercise freedom of choice, but should the schools be held to a higher standard than the young players they recruit?

    "In a sense, it allows student-athletes a degree of freedom, because they can make a verbal commitment and not be bound," Davis said. "The question in this case becomes 'Should universities be allowed that same degree of freedom?'"

  • Actions speak louder than words during recruiting process

    What's the only thing in football that's worth less than a big favorite in a big game in University of Phoenix Stadium?

    A verbal commitment from a college recruit.

    Dan Hawkins
    Dan Hawkins understands the pressures of recruiting both as a coach and as the father of a player.

    Wednesday marks a national holiday for college football recruitniks, when players sign letters of intent. For fans who have obsessed over the whims of teenagers for months, it should be a day of immense relief.

    Those signed letters are binding. Young men who have changed their mind more often than Hamlet finally have to put it in writing. That will be a welcome change after player de-commitments have reached epidemic proportions.

    According to Scouts Inc., ESPN.com's recruiting bureau, 156 players have de-committed from one school in favor of another this recruiting season. Fourteen of those players de-committed more than once. Eleven of the de-commits rank among the ESPN 150.

    And those are just the ones we know of. Surely there were many more that never were publicized.

    About one-third of those 156 de-commitments can be attributed to coaching changes. The other two-thirds can be attributed to the raging insincerity that now flows both ways in football recruiting.

    Put it this way: The term "soft verbal" is now part of the recruiting nomenclature. (It means: "I'm kinda committed. Meanwhile, I'll be visiting another school next Saturday.")

    School-player recruiting relationships are lasting as long as junior-high romances. Players aren't committing to programs so much as going steady with them for a few weeks, then moving on to the next pretty face. That's why rival recruiters completely disregard commitments and keep on calling and writing.

    How bad is it right now? So bad that college basketball recruiting -- a mud fight in the best of times -- looks honorable in comparison. North Carolina basketball coach Roy Williams recently said he hopes his sport never becomes as anarchic as football.

    "You're not making a commitment," Williams said. "You're making a reservation."

    And as every restaurant will tell you, reservations are made to be broken.

    Part of the problem is that the recruiting cycle starts earlier now than ever. Players are making more unofficial campus visits in the spring, when they often encounter the hard sell.

    Coaches can pressure recruits like car salesmen who get customers onto their lot. The goal is to close the deal before they leave. An impulse buy is the purchaser's problem, not the seller's.

    That's why media following recruiting make their phone calls on Sunday nights, to see who committed on the spot. But not all teenagers coming off a whirlwind weekend make a commitment they'll keep.

    "Sometimes we bring them in on a trip and they get excited and want to commit," Colorado coach Dan Hawkins said. "I tell them to go back home, get rid of the buyer's high and think about it. I want to shake hands, look them in the eye and feel good about the deal.

    "I don't have a halo flying over my head. But I just totally believe the kid's got to do what's best for himself."

    The earlier a player commits, the longer he has to wait until he can sign a letter. Which has some coaches pushing for an early signing period.

    Basketball instituted a November signing period quite a while ago, and it's been popular. Players have been happy to get a college decision out of the way before their senior seasons begin.

    There have been proposals from football coaches for a signing period during the late spring of a player's junior year, and for a December period as well. Junior-college players already can sign in December; coaches want to know why players who have made a decision cannot do the same at that time.

    The problem with an early signing period is the ensuing chaos when a coach is fired. Recruits who lock themselves in early, without knowing with certainty who their coach will be, are asking for trouble.

    For now, players who commit early and then must wait for months to sign are still considered in play. Whereas most basketball coaches back off committed prospects, football coaches don't always extend their rivals the same professional courtesy.

    In fact, the saying is that a player's verbal commitment just shows other coaches where to focus their work. And although that saying has its roots in the Southeastern Conference, it's hardly just an SEC thing now.

    At least 11 Big 12 schools have picked up a commitment from a current high school senior who originally pledged to another school. More than half the Pac-10 and Big Ten have done the same. Half the ACC, as well.

    The flip side of the pressure sell is the prospect who struggles to say no. Nobody likes to deliver bad news, and that task can be especially difficult for kids. Hawkins saw it firsthand with his son, Cody, a quarterback who turned down overtures from plenty of schools to play for the Buffaloes with his dad.

    "He had such a difficult time," Dan Hawkins said. "I'd say, 'You need to call so-and-so and tell them [no].' He had a hard time with that."

    It's always easier to say yes than no. But college football players need to reacquaint themselves with the meaning of the word commitment. It doesn't mean you're going steady until something hotter comes along.

  • Money, health care top group's list

    A group of former and current UCLA football players have formed a movement seeking an increase in monthly stipends, full health care coverage and voluntary practices during the offseason, and an increase in life insurance coverage. ESPN.go.com
  • Ex-USC RB Moody chooses Gators

    Even the best players in the country need education about what school is the best fit for them. Fox Sports
  • Division II announces broadband schedule

    Division II and CSTV have announced 20 regular-season football games to be shown via broadband in September. This is a great opportunity for student-athletes to see what kind of talent exists at the Div. II level. Click here to read more about this article. NCAA.org
  • Coaches Split On Early Signing Period

    Some have clamored for years about the benefits of an early signing period while other high profile coaches bemoan about how harmful it can be. But even for those who agree that an early signing period is needed for football- just like basketball- even they can't agree on the perfect date. CSTV
  • No one can rival a QB's to-do list

    So you think you want to play QB in college?  Do you hold all the intangibles?  ESPN.com
  • High School QBs most complex position to evaluate

    Here is what it takes to be a college QB.  Do you have what it takes?   ESPN.com
  • Where are they now?

    Check out the top ranked quaterback recruits for 2002. If an athlete's name does not ring a bell, you have to wonder if they made the best possible decisions along the way. RIVALS.com
  • Dailey lessons

    After four head coaches, two programs and many struggles, Joe Dailey has seen it all. As he finishes his career at UNC, Dailey remains optimistic about his future despite everything he has been through. SI.com
  • Athletes at risk

    With the growing discipline problems plaguing the NFL, the focus on high school football players must change from on field exploits to character building. Integrity, discipline and responsibility must be the main focus across the board for the 2007 high school football season. 4SHOTSports
  • Iowa Football To Have Volunteer Life Skills Assistant

    President Gregory Geoffroy has approved the position of a volunteer life skills assistant for the Iowa State football team. The position entails assisting student-athletes from all beliefs and helping those with different beliefs find other resources with their beliefs when asked to do so.
    USCHO
  • How Home Schoolers Can Earn Athletic Scholarships

    Home-school students have cleared many hurdles to gain academic recognition. Research reveals that home-school students score an average 20 to 30 points above the national average on standardized achievement tests. Colleges and universities across the United States have begun to open their doors to home schoolers. Crosswalk.com                                 
RSS Feed