The Consulting Firm for Student Athletes and their Families

You are here:

SFA Article on TennisRecruiting.net

Getting Started
Playing For Time - The Importance Of Expectations For Recruits
Top 50 Boys Top 50 Girls
Position Number of Players
#1 1
#2 6
#3 3
#4 9
#5 8
#6 7
Bench 12
N/A 4
Position Number of Players
#1 6
#2 8
#3 3
#4 5
#5 5
#6 6
Bench 10
N/A 7

These tables show each player's spot in the lineup at the end of the 2008 spring season. Players listed as N/A are not in school for one reason or another - they could be playing professional tennis or beginning their collegiate career this coming fall. Factors such as injury, illness, or academic ineligibility could have led to a player being on the bench. Moreover, the charts do not include athletes who are playing only doubles for their respective team.

Taking those factors into account, it is still shocking how many of the top players in the nation from just a year ago did not break into the top 6 consistently as freshmen. 22 of the top 100 athletes were unable to crack the starting lineup by the end of their first collegiate season. More players (22) were on the bench then those that played first and second singles combined (21). Even the most highly touted, highly recruited athletes need to consider playing time as they navigate the recruiting process.

Finding a college that will afford you ample playing time is all about expectations. You can either:

1) Choose a school where you will be expecting to compete for a spot in the starting lineup because the talent level at that school is greater than, or equal to, your talent level

OR

2) Choose a school where you will be expecting to excel on the team and in the conference because the talent level at that school is less than, or equal to, your talent level

In situation 1, your tennis game will continue to improve as you compete daily in practice against players who are better than you. At prestigious tennis programs, the improvement in your game due to the great coaching staff and hitting partners could be more important than playing time. This can give collegiate athletes the opportunity to excel in off-season pro-level tournaments. At most of the top schools, some of the best matches of the year take place on the practice courts.

It is also important to note that many recruits use tennis as a means to achieving a greater goal. For example, an athlete sitting on the bench at an Ivy league school may be content to be receiving an education at one of the premier academic schools in the nation.

Once again, it is all about expectations. Now if a recruit went to an Ivy League school expecting to start, only to arrive and find out they were not good enough to crack the top 6, that would be a major disappointment.

If an athlete does not compete as a freshman, there is a chance that they will always be fighting for a spot in the lineup. Schools try to recruit better players every year, and college tennis is only becoming deeper and more competitive due to the influx of international players. While we mentioned that bench players can improve just from practicing, players in the lineup will improve with every match, and the gap between the lineup and the bench will grow.

 

While some kids will display patience in that situation, willing to fight for a spot, many kids will become discouraged. This can often lead to athletes quitting tennis or transferring to another school.

Some recruits will not be content unless they are not only starting, but excelling on their college team. They want the opportunity to stand out on their team as a star, play the best players in the conference, and carry their team to conference championships.

These opportunities will be the reality for the kids who have chosen path #2. Rather than having to compete at an ultra-competitive program, these athletes will put themselves in a position to achieve great success on a slightly lower level. The success that a student-athlete achieves on the tennis court can be the most rewarding experience of their entire collegiate experience.

At the end of the day, if you're an athlete looking at prospective programs, you need to ask yourself some tough questions Are you someone who will feel dejected without playing time? Or will you improve at a stretch school and play better tennis later? Do you have the patience to battle 1, 2, or 3 years to get into the lineup, or are you looking for instant gratification? Would you enjoy the spotlight of starring for a lesser known program, or the fight of competing for a spot in the lineup on a prestigious team?

No two recruits are the same. Every athlete has different needs, including the above. Of course, there are many other factors as well - academics, coach, teammates, facilities, proximity to home, climate, etc. You need to figure out what factors are important to you - and then pick the school best-suited for you. Hopefully this article will help you understand that playing time should absolutely be one of the factors you consider in your college search.

 

13 comments (Add your own)

1. John wrote:
analysis was very interesting about the top 50 players and where they ended up playing their freshman year........seeing that data split by blue chip (top 25) and others would have been easier to draw conclusions......can you provide that info? either way, thanks for the info and analysis.

July 7, 2008 @ 3:00 PM

2. Harris wrote:
good work Ross! Hopefully people will start to see that this is common. So many kids make mistakes and pick the wrong schools. I hope those kids on the bench don't end up switching schools or quitting tennis but I am guessing most of them will. That is very unfortunate since they were so great in the juniors.

July 7, 2008 @ 3:36 PM

3. Jake wrote:
There is a huge difference between the two paths that can make a big difference in a college career. Nice article!

September 4, 2008 @ 11:24 AM

4. Allison wrote:
You gotta make sure you pick the path that is best for you!

September 4, 2008 @ 11:43 AM

5. Micah wrote:
great info. im glad to see this made it up on tennis recruiting.net

September 4, 2008 @ 11:45 AM

6. Nick wrote:
sometimes it's ok to be a small fish in a big pond. later on you might be that big fish in the big pond.

September 4, 2008 @ 11:46 AM

7. Shaun wrote:
love the analysis!

September 4, 2008 @ 11:48 AM

8. Adam wrote:
i would die ridin the pine.

September 4, 2008 @ 11:49 AM

9. Oliver M wrote:
it's tough to hang in there in certain situations but once you crack the lineup it feels great!!

September 4, 2008 @ 11:52 AM

10. Carlos wrote:
International players are definitely mixing things up. Raising the level of play to a place we've never seen before. Everyone has to work harder to get where they want to go!

September 4, 2008 @ 11:53 AM

11. Hank wrote:
the influx of international players into the college game is raising the competition level to new heights that's for sure.

September 4, 2008 @ 11:55 AM

12. Angie wrote:
You need to set your goals high! Just make sure your goals are attainable!

September 4, 2008 @ 11:57 AM

13. Jill wrote:
i played exclusively doubles last year as a freshman but my hard work is paying off because i'll be in the top 6 this year. if you like a school and a coach but you haven't cracked the top 6 yet just keep at it. you might get there sooner rather than later if you keep your focus.

September 4, 2008 @ 11:57 AM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.